Analysis of the 101 page report titled Financial Regulatory Reform
This page provides a link to the 101 page report titled Financial Regulatory Reform, published on June 17 by the US Treasury. We have analyzed it in the weekly podcast for the week ending June 21. Here is a modified version of the relevant excerpts from the podcast transcript:
In short, this report is disappointing, Creation
of a CFPA or Consumer Finance Protection Agency, and the creation of a
FSOC or Financial Services Oversight Council headed by the Treasury, are the two main themes in this long report.
The CFPA will prevent theft and looting and fraud through
prevention of issuing sub-prime loans with adjustable rates, etc. etc. Let us give you a real-life example of how adjustable rates were
adjusting in the past from from 3.75% to 5.75% to 7.75% to 9.75% to
11.75%. So, since 11.75% is more than 3 times 3.75%, if you were paying
35% of your salary when the interest rate was 3.75%, you will
mathematically get foreclosed when it crept up to 11.75%. The smarter
ones were counting on either refinancing or flipping. To learn more, please refer to Sam Mishra's 30 minute
speech provided as a podcast in the Real Estate Section of this website. But all this was
in the past. People don’t take out sub-prime loans any more. The Indy
Macs of the world are bankrupt. Instead of creating the CFPA, if the government instead gave 27000 dollars to each consumer, for the 8 trillion dollars
which the Wall Street bankers drained through the Federal Reserve and the
US treasury, which divided by 300 million Americans works out to 27,000
dollars, that would have been good bottom up revival of the economy.
That would have really boosted the C component in the GDP = C + I + G
macro-economic equation. <Note: But that would not have paid for the Goldman
bonus. And apparently, that is more important to this administration than boosting the national GDP.>
The FSOC
or the Financial Services Oversight Council, which will be chaired by
the Treasury, will also have the Federal Reserve Chairman as a amember. While it looks like snubbing Dr. Ben Bernanke and elevating Secretary
Timothy Geithner, it actually gives more power to the Federal Reserve. In fact the
101 page report states: the Federal Reserve currently holds regulatory
responsibilities over bank holding companies and is best suited to
take on authority and accountability for consolidated supervision of
all Tier 1 FHCs. This FSOC will also have as members the chairmen and
women of FDIC, SEC, and the newly crafted NBS or National Bank
Supervisor. Coming back to who will chair this FSOC, as in the US
treasury secretary, let’s not forget what the honorable secretary had
to say about Goldman a few months ago (either in February or March of 2009) when quizzed by the Senators on
whether the multi-million compensation guzzling CEO of Goldman should not be
axed, for he laid off 10% of his work-force, while paying his cronies
and huge bonus? Well what the Senator did not add was all this was done
directly or indirectly through the tax dollars, for Goldman received
12.9 billion dollar handout from AIG, and also received 10 billion dollars from
TARP, and they have returned the 10 billion to escape the compensation
czar. But what is interesting is what the honorable secretary had to
say in reply: it is up to the Goldman board to decide that.
Here, an analogy is in order. It is like
your home town police chief chiding all your home town cops after a
major bank robbery, when he knows who the robbers are, for the robbers
have robbed the bank and partying with the looted money in a nearby
town, which the police chief will join a little later, after doing his
obligatory chiding and admonition. This Financial Regulatory Reform is akin to that police chief chiding the cops: let’s clean up our act.
Let’s not let it happen again. The bank got looted. The town suffered.
Instead of inspiring the cops: we know who these robbers are and where
they party and how they party. Come on boys, let’s catch them... Yeah,
the will is lacking in the current administration to catch the real
thieves, the wall-street bankers. Putting a Maddoff in jail is just
scratching the surface. You want meaningful reform? Then throw a few of
those Goldman executives in jail, instead of giving them Treasury jobs!
In
fact, that is all this 101 page report does, it is a summary of what
happened in the last couple of years, starting with the sub-prime
loans, leading up to the financial meltdown. God, the US treasury
department hires full-time people for months to write a report like
that. Well, you didn’t have to do that, you submissive treasury
employees. All you had to was read our articles on real-estate and
markets which have been in publication for more than 2 years now, and our articles on the 14 trillion (now 20 trillion dollar value drain), as
in 20 trillion dollar looting and rape of the American consumer by the
rich wall-street bankers and their cohorts.
Once the
dust settles, and the markets are back up, these wall-street boys will
gather together and say: hey, let’s make some money. They will cook up
some new derivatives. They will deploy a few hundred lawyers to look
for loop-holes in these new committees and new regulations. In other words, these cosmetic regulatory reforms will lead to nothing, for the Wall Street thieves and swindlers are still at play, and the American taxpayer is still the prey. Since the system is corrupt, past treasury secretaries like Rubin and Summers have taken advantage by joining Wall-Street after their public service gigs! Will the current treasury secretary succumb to the temptation of big money?
Advice to the current administration (June 2009): Give the hard working, tax-paying, Americans a break! Don't loot their money to fill the personal bank accounts of the already rich Wall Street Bankers. Appoint the right people for positions of responsibility. If you appoint alums and supporters of Goldman Sachs for key Treasury jobs, the bankers will use the US Treasury (and the tax dollars) as a conduit to drain away (or suck away) value from the American tax-payer. This is unethical, immoral, and sub-human animalistic pandering to the elitistic bankers at the cost of the people who have elected you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|





